> Weekly Torah Portion > Intermediate > What's Bothering Rashi?

Abraham 'Believed' Hashem

Lech Lecha (Genesis 12-17 )

by Dr. Avigdor Bonchek

Genesis 15:6

"And he believed in Hashem and He considered it for him as righteousness."



And he believed in Hashem - RASHI: He didn't ask for a sign to [confirm] this. But regarding the promise to inherit the land he did ask for a sign and asked "How shall I know [that I will inherit the land]?"

Why has Rashi added the matter of asking for a sign, which is nowhere evident in the verse?

Your Answer:



An Answer: The statement that Abraham 'believed' Hashem is quite strange. Stranger yet is the statement that God considered this 'believing' an act of righteousness.

Of course Abraham believed God! Why not? God had spoken to him personally. If Abraham doubted that he experienced a true prophetic event, then why should he believe in his hallucination? But certainly the prophetic event was of the kind that brings with it a sense of certainty. So again we ask: Why shouldn't Abraham believe God's word? And why was such believing considered righteousness?

These are the questions that Rashi is dealing with. How does his comment deal with them?

Your Answer:



An Answer: Rashi takes for granted that Abraham believed God's words, for the reason we said above. Instead, Rashi interprets the words "he believed" to mean he did not even ask for a sign, as he did in the promise of inheriting the land. It was not an issue of believing or not believing. It was rather an issue of asking or not asking for a sign.

But now we can ask: Why then did Abraham ask for a sign about the inheritance of the land? Didn't he have sufficient faith in that promise?

Can you think of an answer?

Hint: See Rashi's next comment on this verse.



An Answer: Rashi is certainly consistent. In his next comment, he says that Abraham did not ask for a sign to validate God's promise. Rather, he asked to understand by what merit he would be given such a gift as the Land of Israel. The answer was, as Rashi says, by the merit of the sacrifices that the Children of Israel would offer to God in the land.

We can continue to ask: Why didn't Abraham ask on what basis God would fulfill His promise about offspring, as he asked in the case of inheriting the land?

Your answer:



An Answer: I would say that the promise to have children needn't be based on special merit. Most people in the world have children. Abraham and Sarah were deprived of children up until that point. Having children would have made them equal to other people. Although having children is most certainly a special privilege, yet since most people merit it, Abraham had no need to ask for a sign of that merit.


Shabbat Shalom,
Avigdor Bonchek


Leave a Reply

1 2 3 2,899

🤯 ⇐ That's you after reading our weekly email.

Our weekly email is chock full of interesting and relevant insights into Jewish history, food, philosophy, current events, holidays and more.
Sign up now. Impress your friends with how much you know.
We will never share your email address and you can unsubscribe in a single click.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram